Donor retention and measurement is an interesting
conversation for any fundraising group to have. So often we gravitate to the
linear aspect of measurement because it's easy to grasp. Southwest airlines
several years ago decided to measure happiness a unique but highly impactful
exercise. As an industry
we may be served extremely well not to throw in the
towel so quickly on designing metrics around monetary transactions. Because
with a little work we might be able to actually measure the right things and
the things that will create the greatest impact to the bottom line that we wish
to have. Now this is not to say that the money aspect is not critical to the
business of raising money because clearly that is our purpose, however it is
important to note that our success with the raising of money is directly
related to the length of time our customers or donors choose to remain
connected to our organization and our mission.
Another significant achilles' heel for our industry is that
our metrics in general are short in nature. We measure items connected
to how we are doing compared to last year, interesting
and important pieces of data to understand but they do very little
in helping us understand the momentum that we are creating with the people we wish to
remain connected to. Many of the
conversations today regarding donor retention revolve around renewing a gift.
This consistent focus on the transaction of a gift is continuing to drink from
the poisoned well that has actually caused the retention issues we wish to resolve.
I have spent my career studying and redesigning the process
of fundraising to address this significant
issue of donor retention. What I've concluded is very similar to the theories that were demonstrated in the movie Money Ball. In a wonderful scene between Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill in the garage Jonah looked at Brad said baseball is archaic in its thinking. They are measuring all the wrong things. You shouldn't be looking to buy players you should be looking to buy wins, and in order to buy wins you need to buy runs.
issue of donor retention. What I've concluded is very similar to the theories that were demonstrated in the movie Money Ball. In a wonderful scene between Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill in the garage Jonah looked at Brad said baseball is archaic in its thinking. They are measuring all the wrong things. You shouldn't be looking to buy players you should be looking to buy wins, and in order to buy wins you need to buy runs.
Take that same logic and drop that over the raising of money.
In order to raise money you actually need donors. To raise the most amount of
money from those donors you need to keep them longer and have them feel that
supporting your organization is adding value and quality to their life.
So what if you
measured major gift officers by looking at the individuals that they manage.
What is the average length of time that their donors have remained on the books.
Is that length of time increasing or decreasing. That's a linear metric
connected to the sustaining of a relationship. Have their gifts for this pool
grown over a period of time has it remained stagnant or is it shrinking. To begin measuring performance around
sustaining and deepening relationships with the people that organizations are
strategically connected to will pay significantly higher dividends than the
shortsighted metric of how many visits that you make this month.
If we focus on the transaction we will accomplish very
little with building a motivated donor
Because:
If you want to raise
money you need to have donors. If you
want to have donors supporting you at the capacity with which they could give
you need to have emotionally motivated committed donors. If you want to have
emotionally motivated and committed donors you need to be measuring whether or
not you are adding value to their life. One way to measure that value is the
length of time they choose to remain connected in support of your organization. Since donors typically do not lead with their best gift retention (length of time) matters.
Our traditional belief that measuring transactions will
deliver the most resources to our bottom line have
clearly been proven to be inaccurate over time. As it becomes increasingly more challenging to connect with people in an incredibly crowded space we will need to rethink how we've been connecting with our donors over the last 50 years. If am continually surprised that the largest provider of software to our industry does not even have a method of giving you actual retention rates. If you do not know the average length of time your donors stay on the books today and how that relates to the length of time 5 & 10 years ago, then every strategy decision you make is unrelated to your organizations ability to grow strategic relationships.
clearly been proven to be inaccurate over time. As it becomes increasingly more challenging to connect with people in an incredibly crowded space we will need to rethink how we've been connecting with our donors over the last 50 years. If am continually surprised that the largest provider of software to our industry does not even have a method of giving you actual retention rates. If you do not know the average length of time your donors stay on the books today and how that relates to the length of time 5 & 10 years ago, then every strategy decision you make is unrelated to your organizations ability to grow strategic relationships.
If you are interested in this proprietary measurement tool or head here. What to dramatically increase retention with proven practices? check out the Donor Retention Boot Camp this summer.
No comments:
Post a Comment